The browser has quietly become the riskiest application in the enterprise tech stack. Employees work, share, and coโcreate with AI from inside a browser that was never designed for enterpriseโgrade security or data loss prevention. Attackers know that a single malicious script or credential theft in that environment can route around even the most mature SSE, EDR, and DLP programs.
The new analyst report by Gartnerยฎ, โFocus on Securing Browsers, Not Forcing a Secure Browser,โ underscores this shift and validates what many CISOs are already experiencing: the real problem is not which browser your users choose, but how you secure all of them in an AIโdriven world.
โChromium-based browsers account for approximately 75% of the total browser market share, making them an exceptionally lucrative target forย cyberattackersย ย exploiting infrequent or unreliable patch managementย cadences.โ โย Gartner
What we think Gartner says is really changing
In our opinion, the core message by Gartner is that longโstanding browser vulnerabilities plus rapid AI integration have created a new class of security and privacy risk that traditional network and endpoint tools do not adequately address. Instead of attempting a wholesale migration to a single โsecure browser,โ Gartner recommends deploying secure enterprise browser solutions, including hardened browsers and extensions, as a complementary tool on organization-managed endpoints to address specific identified security gaps, rather than replacing or relaxing existing endpoint and network security controls.
The report highlights secure enterprise browsers (SEBs) as critical controls to close โinโsessionโ gaps such as malicious extensions, driveโby exploits, and zeroโday vulnerabilities, while stressing that SEBs must integrate deeply with the broader security stack and cannot be treated as standalone silver bullets. Gartner also emphasizes that AI browsers and AI features inside mainstream browsers drastically expand the attack surface and urges security leaders to adopt AI TRiSMโstyle controls to monitor and restrict AI usage directly in the browser, where prompts and responses actually live.
Standout stat: Gartner notes that zeroโday patches for Chromium can take 24โ72 hoursย to land in fullโstack enterprise browsers. This is an exposure window that attackers can and do exploit.
Why forcing a dedicated browser fails in practice
To us, A key nuance in the report is the distinction between when to use fullโstack enterprise browsers and when to rely on secure browser extensions. Forcing a dedicated enterprise browser makes sense only in tightly scoped use cases such as โclean roomโ workspaces, access for thirdโparty endpoints, and others. Outside those contexts, Gartner is blunt: most organizations have never been able to dictate a single browser for productivity or security reasons.
โOver the past few decades, most organizations have not been able to dictate a single browser for productivity or security reasons. The emergence of secure enterprise browsers does not change this reality. With the release of the Comet browser from Perplexity and other AI vendors announcing their own integrated AI browsers, end users are likely to want more, not fewer, browsers to improve work productivity. โย Gartner
That reality creates a structural problem for vendors whose model depends on switching users into a dedicated enterprise browser. If security is bound to a special browser, any user activity that stays in Chrome, Edge, Safari, or an emerging AI browser falls outside your policy and telemetry. This creates a splitโbrain security posture that is hardest to manage precisely where risk is growing fastest.
Gartner captures this tradeโoff directly by recommending secure enterprise browser extensions to expand reach and โminimize the attack surface across multiple browsers,โ especially when there is no organizational mandate to restrict browser choice.
How we believe Seraphic aligns with the Gartner blueprint
We believe Seraphicโs approach was built around the exact challenges Gartner calls out: diverse browser environments, AIโdriven workflows, and the need to treat SEBs as complementary controls that integrate with the rest of the security stack. Rather than compelling users to adopt a new browser, Seraphic turns any traditional or AI browser into a secure enterprise browser through a lightweight agent that operates at the browserโs JavaScript engine layer.
This architecture gives CISOs several advantages that map directly to Gartnerโs evaluation criteria. Seraphic enforces inline data loss prevention (DLP) in the browser itself, controlling uploads, downloads, clipboard, screenshots, printing, and screen sharing, without the latency penalties of routing traffic through proxies. It also brings behavioral controls and exploit prevention directly into the browser runtime, enabling threat detection in the precise execution path Gartner flags as a priority.
Seraphicโs customer feedback reflects this alignment.
โSeraphic enables Waste Management to adopt a โBring Your Own Browserโ approach, ensuring enterprise-grade security without compromising workforce convenience.โ – Jerich Beason, CISO at WM
โSeraphic is a keyย componentย of our ZTNA and has retained a 100% phishing detection rate.โ – Petri Ala-Annala, CISOย atย Nobia.ย
We believe that this combination of coverage, user choice, and measurable effectiveness is exactly what Gartner urges buyers to validate when they evaluate secure enterprise browser controls.
Securing the AI browser without breaking workflows
Gartner dedicates a significant portion of the report to AI, noting that AI browsers, AIโenhanced traditional browsers, and autonomous AI browsing agents create entirely new risks – from prompt injection and jailbreaking to opaque data flows across plugins, local models, and cloud APIs. The authors stress that secure enterprise browsers should provide ways to inspect GenAI prompts and responses in clear text and apply intentโaware policies, without breaking encryption or relying solely on networkโlevel inspection.
Seraphicโs AI browser security capabilities were designed with this scenario in mind. Because Seraphic runs inside the browser runtime, it can monitor and control how users and AI tools interact with SaaS applications, private data, and identity providers. Seraphicโs GenAI dashboard provides visibility into which AI tools are used, what data they touch, and which actions occur. Its AI access control lets security teams define granular policies for which AI tools are allowed, what data can be shared, and how sensitive content is masked, watermarked, or blocked in real time.
Actionable next steps for CISOs
A browserโnative platform like Seraphic can help you:
- Build a browser security strategy, not a browser standardization project: Treat secure enterprise browsers and extensions as complementary controls; avoid long, disruptive migrations to dedicated enterprise browsers except for narrow, highโvalue use cases.
- Prioritize inโbrowser DLP and AI controls: Focus on investment in inline browser controls that can inspect and govern uploads, downloads, clipboard, screen capture, and AI interactions without breaking user workflows or HTTPS.
- Extend protection to every browser and device: Use a single agentโbased approach to cover managed endpoints, BYOD, contractors, and AI browsers so that data loss prevention and threat detection policies follow the userโnot a specific browser.
- Evaluate vendors using Gartnerโs questions: Ask how solutions monitor malicious extensions, protect JavaScript engine & WebAssembly, resist tampering, and integrate with your SIEM, SOAR, SSE, and EDR stack.
Final Thoughts
For security leaders who recognize that the โenterprise browserโ is no longer a product, but a security posture that must apply to every browser and every AI experience, Seraphic offers a futureโready path: turn the browsers your users already love into enterprise browsers.
To dive deeper into the Gartner analysis, read the full licensed Gartner report, โFocus on Securing Browsers, Not Forcing a Secure Browser,โ available complementary by Seraphic.
Gartner, Focus on Securing Browsers, Not Forcing a Secure Browser, 13 October 2025, Max Taggett Et Al.
GARTNER is a trademark of Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates.